Christiane and I had a very interesting conversation the other day regarding a couple of cultural practices commonly engaged in by young children in the LDS Church (encouraged by the adults, of course) — bearing their testimonies in Sacrament meeting, and partaking of the Sacrament before they are baptized.
For me, the issue regarding the bearing of a testimony comes down to just what is (and is not) a testimony and the reasons for expressing it publicly over the pulpit. Having a parent whisper into a child’s ear and then, if they aren’t frozen like a deer caught in headlights, listening to the child regurgitate it (often loudly and unintelligibly) into the microphone just does not constitute the “bearing of a testimony” for me. I’m not saying that it’s impossible for any child under age eight to have a testimony, nor am I saying that no child under eight should be allowed to bear it publicly. I’m saying that the testimony they bear should be their own — and not many children are going to acquire a testimony of their own at that young an age — and they should be able to do so unassisted.
The First Presidency addressed this issue in a letter to all Church members in May of 2002, which was read in Sacrament meeting. It said, in part:
Parents and teachers should help children learn what a testimony is and when it is appropriate for them to express it. It may be best to have younger children learn to share their testimonies at such times as family home evening or when giving talks in Primary until they are old enough to do so in a fast and testimony meeting.
Amen.
As for young children partaking of the Lord’s Supper, my feeling is that children that have not yet been baptized probably shouldn’t participate — there’s no point in renewing covenants that haven’t yet been made. On the few occasions when I’ve discussed it with adult members of the Church, the argument is usually raised that children are given the Sacrament from an early age so they will develop the custom or habit of taking it. Personally, I don’t believe the Sacrament should be taken by rote, but rather should be approached with personal prayer and contemplation each and every time. If anything, habitualizing the event seems to me to be counter to the very spirit of the ordinance. And wouldn’t having to wait until after baptism make it all the more special and further underscore its importance to the child?
Christiane and I discussed these two cultural oddities and explored the idea of disallowing both for our own children. I won’t speak for her, but my personal conclusions are:
As much as I’d like to do so, I don’t know whether it’s really possible to force one’s children to abstain from bearing their “testimony” in Sacrament meeting — between well-meaning Primary teachers who “challenge” their classes to get up en masse and bear their testimonies, and the pressure of their parents and classmates to go along, the expectation to do so is just too great. It would take a complete shift in attitude and approach for this to change. (It seems to me that many in the Church have over the course of years come to a serious misunderstanding of what a testimony is and the purpose for bearing it, and our “open mic” format seems to encourage tangents and travelogues — but that’s a topic for a post of its own.)
As for preventing our children from taking the Sacrament until after they are baptized, my preference is that they abstain, but I’m also pretty sure this is not a battle I’ll want to fight week after week if they throw fits over it. I suppose we will have to revisit this topic when we actually have children. My desire is that they treat the Sacrament with reverence and respect, however that is accomplished.